Inclusion in the classroom has been an ongoing issue in
history. There is a big historical background of inclusion dating back to the
Supreme Court case Brown vs. Board of Education, which made it apparent
intellectually disabled students were discriminated against. John F. Kennedy
made the issue of “mental retardation” known to the public during his
presidency. Laws were soon passed to make inclusion in the classroom a fair
thing to the intellectually disabled. These laws included the IDEA. Some
important terms that are useful to know with the issue of inclusion are
mainstreaming, IEP’s, and inclusion itself. There was a time when students with
disabilities were not allowed in regular schools. There was no law in America
saying that a student with intellectually disabilities had to be taught. In
time, students with disabilities were only confined to a special classroom.
People had thought that even just the presence of a child with a disability was
a threat to a “normal child.” They would be confined to a special
education classroom since others had thought they would be a detriment in
general classrooms. Inclusion is viewed as a good thing to some
since it allows the students to learn and be a part of their peers. A big
argument in this is that separate is not equal. It allows the students with
disabilities to gain communication skills with their fellow peers. It provides
a sense of belonging and an appropriate modeling of social, behavioral, and
academic skills. Some individuals do argue that inclusion is not a good thing.
One thing people argue is that the students with the disabilities aren’t
getting the right care they need inside a general classroom. I believe the need
of the student should first be analyzed and considered before any decisions
must be made.
No comments:
Post a Comment